职称英语（综合类）模拟试题（六）
In 1830, the U.S. Congress passed a law. It allowed the government to remove Indians from their lands. The Cherokees refused to go. They had lived on their lands for centuries. It belonged to them. Why should they go to a strange land far beyond the Mississippi River?
The army was sent to drive the Cherokees out. Soldiers surrounded their villages and marched them at gunpoint into the western territory. The sick, the old and the small children went in carts, along with their belongings. The rest of the people marched on foot or rode on horseback. It was November, yet many of them still wore their summer clothes. Cold and hungry, the Cherokees were quickly exhausted by the hardships of the journey. Many dropped dead and were buried by the roadside. When the last group arrived in their new home in March 1839, more than 4,000 had died. It was indeed a march of death.
36. The Cherokee Nation used to live ______.
A）on the American continent
B）in the southeastern part of the US
C）beyond the Mississippi River
D）in the western territory
37. One of the ways that Sequoyah copied from the white man is the way of ______.
A）writing down the spoken language
B）making word pictures
C）teaching his people reading
D）printing their own newspaper
38. A law was passed in 1830 to ______.
A）allow the Cherokees to stay where they were
B）send the army to help the Cherokees
C）force the Cherokees to move westward
D）forbid the Cherokees to read their newspaper
39. When the Cherokees began to leave their lands, ______.
A）they went in carts
B）they went on horseback
C）they marched on foot
D）all of the above
40. Many Cherokees died on their way to their new home mainly because ______.
A）they were not willing to go there(www.xuehuiba.com)版权所有www.xuehuiba.com
B）the government did not provide transportation
C）they did not have enough food and clothes
D）the journey was long and boring
5.阅读理解 （三）
Language
Language is and should be a living thing, constantly enriched with new words and forms of expression. But there is a vital distinction between good developments, which add to the language, enabling us to say things we could not say before, and bad developments, which subtract from the language by rendering it less precise. A vivacious, colorful use of words is not to be confused with mere slovenliness①. The kind of slovenliness in which some professionals deliberately indulge is perhaps akin② to the cult③ of the unfinished work, which has eroded most of the arts in our time. And the true answer to it is the same that art is enhanced, not hindered, by discipline. You cannot carve satisfactorily in butter.
The corruption of written English has been accompanied by an even sharper decline in the standard of spoken English. We speak very much less well than was common among educated Englishmen generation or two ago.
The modern theatre has played a baneful part in dimming our appreciation of language. Instead of the immensely articulate dialogue of, for example, Shaw （who was also very insistent off good pronunciation）, audiences are now subjected to streams of barely literate trivia④, often designed, only too well, to exhibit "lack of communication", and larded with the obscenities and grammatical errors of the intellectually impoverished. Emily Post once advised her readers: "The theatre is the best possible place to hear correctly-enunciated speech." Alas, no more. One young actress was recently reported to be taking lessons in how to speak badly, so that she should fit in better.
But the BBC is the worst traitor. After years of very successfully helping to raise the general standard of spoken English, it suddenly went into reverse. As the head of the pronunciation unit coyly put it: "In the 1960s the BBC opened the field to a much wider range of speakers." To hear a BBC disc jockey talking to the latest ape-like pop idol is a truly shocking experience of verbal squalor⑤. And the prospect seems to be of even worse to come. School teachers are actively encouraged to ignore little Johnnys incoherent grammar, atrocious spelling and haphazard punctuation, because worrying about such things might inhibit his creative genius.
Notes：
①slovenliness n. 不修边幅，马虎
②akin a. 同族的，相似的
上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 下一页